NARB designs for web augmented space. Our latest project was an online, and mobile, art-guide that allowed realtime visitor feedback from visitors at the venue.

Narb blog reports on new developments in technology and the museum and gallery experience as well as letting you know what's happening with us. Your hosts are James and Tijs.



You should follow us on Twitter

Archive

Oct
2nd
Sun
permalink
Comments (View)
Jun
9th
Wed
permalink

Survey says…

These last few months we were joined by Margita van Vugt who, as a student of the local Reinwardt Academy, spent some time researching new developments in the dutch cultural scene. What follows is a quick summary of her research and results. We’ll be sure to update this post as soon as the actual research paper is released, so watch this space if you interested in the full results.

Some time ago I read about NARB and got stoked, what a great idea! I study museology and art history and am interested in ways of making art more accessible. Luckily Tijs and James accepted my request to do an internship at NARB, and I started in February. At that time the business situation was not optimal. In earlier blog posts you probably read about it: visitor numbers and participation were not solid enough to build a business upon, so it was clear something had to change. We decided that I would set up a survey to find out what changes would be most beneficial.

I thought it would be helpful to get an overview of experiences of museums with new technology. What are their experiences so far and what are their wishes for the future? A questionnaire was sent out to 235 museums and I received 65 responses.

The results showed:

  • All museums are open to new things
  • Some museums are very progressive and active whilst others are faced with too many stumbling blocks
  • Time and money are the biggest stumbling blocks
  • There needs to be a change in attitude among museum staff, but this requires more time

Next to the questionnaire I spoke to several people working at museums. This gave more insight in the different attitudes. Some are active in the (r)evolution that ICT accelerates in business, in showing the collection and in interaction with the public. For others the first wish is still to digitize their collection and they don’t see big changes for their institution in the near future. 

Some, in my opinion, more unexpected results of the survey are:

  • More than half of the museums (52%) responded positive to the question if they would like to show opinions of visitors to other visitors on screens in the exhibition space (like a Twitter feed). The majority of art museums, historical museums and ethnological museums are in favour of this and all technical museums
  • 75% scored 7 or higher on a scale of 0 to 10 for the question how important they considered it to use new media to present their collections
  • The survey results did not show big differences between museums with a small number of visitors and museums with big visitor numbers in opinions about different media. (Obviously the bigger museums have tried more stuff already because they had the possibility to do so)
  • Two out of every three museums say that when making the exhibition program, the wishes of their public influence the content of the exhibition for 50%.

Conclusion: It is a time of experiments but not everybody has the time/money/manpower to partake in these trials. The museums that do have these resources are testing new applications on a large scale. The others are mainly waiting until time has shown the best ways to incorporate new technologies so they can adopt those without risks.

My opinion about these findings? Most of them are not very surprising and it’s too bad the survey couldn’t help to save NARB the art guide. But for me it was a really good experience to talk to different people about the subject and to hang out at NARB HQ. 

The results show that the slow uptake of NARB is not a due to lack of enthusiasm of museum people. So I hope this promises good things for the future of exhibitions!

Margita

Comments (View)
May
20th
Thu
permalink
Here yee, here yee. We announceth today we are shutting down our art exhibition guide. 
Why? Well, it’s just not being used enough. Most of the reasons for this have been covered in an earlier blog post. While the art exhibition guide will halt, we are continuing research and work in the cultural sector. It’s not easy to admit failure, but in the case of the art guide, while it seemed like a timely and useful service, assumptions on its eventual use and audience uptake were far short of expectations. Was it worth building? Hell yeah. We learned how to build and deploy a platform for museums. We also got to meet many wonderful people working within the cultural sector. 
Reflecting on our experience, Tijs and I have have toned some new muscles which included gaining far greater insight into how participation works in museums (both on and offline). We feel that while this is definitive obituary for our art guide, it’s a rebirth (not bathtub-centric holotropic breathing techniques) of what we can do and mean for the cultural sector as a technology and design partner. 
Maybe with more time & resources we could have etched out enough of a user base to support a small business around the online art guide concept. But this is a small market with a really diverse and not always easy to reach audience. We do still believe there’s lots of opportunity for interesting projects that bring new models of interaction, powered by online networks and tools, into the venue. And we’ll discuss some of our ideas on that in a later blog post.
You might ask what you then can expect from our site, now we are closing down the art exhibition guide? Not your nearest exhibitions i’m afraid. We will stick around to design and build on/off-line experiments though. The exact shape of that particular organization will unfold over the coming months.
Up next: Margita van Vugt shares some of the research results from her internship at NARB which she is currently finalizing…
Next week: We will be sharing what we can from NARB starting with a data release of cultural locations under a CC zero license.  We will also write a small how-to on building your own exhibition guide service and more…

Here yee, here yee. We announceth today we are shutting down our art exhibition guide. 

Why? Well, it’s just not being used enough. Most of the reasons for this have been covered in an earlier blog post. While the art exhibition guide will halt, we are continuing research and work in the cultural sector. It’s not easy to admit failure, but in the case of the art guide, while it seemed like a timely and useful service, assumptions on its eventual use and audience uptake were far short of expectations. Was it worth building? Hell yeah. We learned how to build and deploy a platform for museums. We also got to meet many wonderful people working within the cultural sector.

Reflecting on our experience, Tijs and I have have toned some new muscles which included gaining far greater insight into how participation works in museums (both on and offline). We feel that while this is definitive obituary for our art guide, it’s a rebirth (not bathtub-centric holotropic breathing techniques) of what we can do and mean for the cultural sector as a technology and design partner. 

Maybe with more time & resources we could have etched out enough of a user base to support a small business around the online art guide concept. But this is a small market with a really diverse and not always easy to reach audience. We do still believe there’s lots of opportunity for interesting projects that bring new models of interaction, powered by online networks and tools, into the venue. And we’ll discuss some of our ideas on that in a later blog post.

You might ask what you then can expect from our site, now we are closing down the art exhibition guide? Not your nearest exhibitions i’m afraid. We will stick around to design and build on/off-line experiments though. The exact shape of that particular organization will unfold over the coming months.

Up next: Margita van Vugt shares some of the research results from her internship at NARB which she is currently finalizing…

Next week: We will be sharing what we can from NARB starting with a data release of cultural locations under a CC zero license.  We will also write a small how-to on building your own exhibition guide service and more…

Comments (View)
Dec
25th
Fri
permalink

Hottest Exhibitions of 2009

After reading the closing comments here i figured it would be fun to dive into the NARB database and come up with a totally unscientific but kinda interesting measure for calculating the best exhibitions of 2009.

I kept the rules deliberately simple; an exhibition has to have taken place (at least partly) in 2009 obviously. And i decided to look at active attention and judgement (trips, likes, etc.) and leave out of passive attention (i.e. views) from the equation.

So without further ado, and with a grain of salt, i present to you the Hottest Exhibitions of 2009 in The Netherlands.

  1. Richard Avedon: Photographs 1946 – 2004, FOAM photography museum
  2. Elixir: The Video Organism of Pipilotti Rist, Boijmans Van Beuningen
  3. Brazilian Art Now, Boijmans Van Beuningen
  4. Michael Raedecker en Emo Verkerk, GEM
  5. The Art of Fashion: Installing Allusions, Boijmans Van Beuningen
  6. Air Pressure, Botanische Tuinen, Fort Hoofddijk
  7. Rotterdam Design Prize 2009, Boijmans Van Beuningen
  8. At the Russian Court, Hermitage Amsterdam
  9. Sally Man, Fotomuseum Den Haag
  10. PRUNE - Abstracting Reality, FOAM photography museum

I’ll steer clear of grand conclusions but i guess Boijmans and FOAM had a good year and it seems photography is pretty hot in general.

Comments (View)
Dec
8th
Tue
permalink
Confessions of an online art guide
Shorter days spell an end to the year and provide a good reason to review NARB’s progress over 2009. We officially launched in March at Rotterdam Museum Night and spent the months after making deals with cultural data providers like the Dutch Uitburo.nl to improve coverage and working on the website and an iPhone app of which we released the third version recently. We also made it possible to add exhibitions for people in other countries. At the same time we’ve stood on many a stage to present our ideas and talked with museums, galleries and heritage people about partnerships. We also designed & created NARB installations for museums, the latest one the 2009 Design Prize at Museum Boijmans van Beuningen. So where are we today? After appraising web analytics and museum interventions it seems the current version of the ‘NARB platform’ works best as a tool for augmenting exhibitions at museums and galleries, for instance being used for competitions or as a bridge to other social networks. Meanwhile membership while it did grow has not yet reached the sort of numbers that we had hoped for. We have many theories on why exactly this is but we haven’t nailed down a single thing that would be solved by an easy fix.
So while the truth behind our slow uptake is probably a combination of these, we believe that…
 Art is a niche, which equals small viewership. Maybe obviously, but worth remembering perhaps.
 Urban city guides already provide editorialized art events. (companies like Unlike.net are doing great work here) 
 Our user experience is not compelling enough. We have a lot of functionality, but it’s still missing what you might call flow. 
 People, both visitors and venues, are already invested in other social platforms like Facebook and it’s platforms like these where (almost) everybody can be found online these days. 
 With museums and galleries more likely to move social networking activities across to Facebook to announce exhibitions, and the most vocal in-crowd folks using Twitter to talk about art, we might have to face the fact that getting the ‘culture crowd’ to invest in a new social network (or platform) like NARB might take more investment than we can bring to the party. At the same time, our dedicated social tools for exhibitions have succeeded in attracting some solid use, especially when combined with a competition formula. As long as it’s a easy to understand and has a clear goal with richer incentives these more physical interactions seem to entice people to use them.
What’s our take-away from all this?
For starters, something has to change. While visitors numbers are OK, considering the art niche, it’s not enough to build a sustaining business model as the participation in our platform is generally too low volume. This combined with the cold hard fact that getting the actual data to be able to show which exhibitions or events are taking place where, let alone which are the most worthwhile, is too time consuming since right now it can’t be done without at least some manual labor involved.
What do we want to change?
We already have a few ideas about how to transform the current website into something that will be more viable in the future and be easier to support both from our point of view and from the point of view of the venues listed on our site. From a business perspective we think NARB should concentrate on activities that can return on investment. Right now that’s installation work, consulting and creating tools for cultural institutions that will allow these institutions to get online sooner, better and easier. In some ways we built a site for a future that just isn’t there yet. So were taking a step back and seeing which things need to be in place first before the full NARB vision can actually come to fruition. The most glaring thing in need of improvement is the state of cultural data. While agencies such as the dutch Uitburo do what they can to scrape together data about events from a myriad of sources it’s far from an ideal situation and in most cases the data is not complete, nor correct or in other ways flawed. That’s no fault of the Uitburo, they do what they can with the resources they have, but it’s a result of a system that is basically broken. For each exhibition taking place in NL, there are 100 people hired across the country, typing in dates for events into their own little database, sending out press releases and generally duplicating each others work. While the obvious source for exhibition data, or event data of any kind, should be the venue that’s hosting the event in the first place. Or at least thats what we think.
 This is obviously not a problem that’s easily fixed, if it’s possible to fix it at all, but there are already solutions out there and we’ll try and figure out how we can make those tools easier to find, easier to use and when they don’t exist yet we might create tools ourselves that would allow venues to easily publish their event date online for use in NARB and other event guides, magazines et al.
 In the meantime we’ll try and adapt our site to work better by focusing more on the venues themselves instead of events taking place. This is data which is widely available right now and for most countries and cities worldwide. At the same time we’ll try and widen our reach a bit to encompass more than just contemporary art by opening up to cultural venues in general. We’re not going to go into clubs, bars and music halls but we might add the history museum or that cool design shop / gallery downtown.
 Thing is, these are all just ideas right now. We’re working with museums and other cultural events right now to make some of this happen but as far as the site, and the iPhone app, is concerned all possibilities are still up in the air. In the coming months we’ll be talking to a wide range of people and asking their and your help in figuring out what NARB should look like in the future to become the worthwhile addition to the cultural arena that we hope it will be at some point.
 Practically speaking you might notice some small changes to the site now and then. Some of the functionality you have come to take for granted might disappear, for lack of it being used. Some other things might take their place. Do not despair, it’s all part of the plan. So here’s our perspective, we’d love to hear
yours!
 Yours sincerely,                 Tijs & James

Confessions of an online art guide

Shorter days spell an end to the year and provide a good reason to review NARB’s progress over 2009. We officially launched in March at Rotterdam Museum Night and spent the months after making deals with cultural data providers like the Dutch Uitburo.nl to improve coverage and working on the website and an iPhone app of which we released the third version recently. We also made it possible to add exhibitions for people in other countries. At the same time we’ve stood on many a stage to present our ideas and talked with museums, galleries and heritage people about partnerships. We also designed & created NARB installations for museums, the latest one the 2009 Design Prize at Museum Boijmans van Beuningen. So where are we today?

After appraising web analytics and museum interventions it seems the current version of the ‘NARB platform’ works best as a tool for augmenting exhibitions at museums and galleries, for instance being used for competitions or as a bridge to other social networks. Meanwhile membership while it did grow has not yet reached the sort of numbers that we had hoped for. We have many theories on why exactly this is but we haven’t nailed down a single thing that would be solved by an easy fix.

So while the truth behind our slow uptake is probably a combination of these, we believe that…

  • Art is a niche, which equals small viewership. Maybe obviously, but worth remembering perhaps.
  • Urban city guides already provide editorialized art events. (companies like Unlike.net are doing great work here)
  • Our user experience is not compelling enough. We have a lot of functionality, but it’s still missing what you might call flow.
  • People, both visitors and venues, are already invested in other social platforms like Facebook and it’s platforms like these where (almost) everybody can be found online these days.


With museums and galleries more likely to move social networking activities across to Facebook to announce exhibitions, and the most vocal in-crowd folks using Twitter to talk about art, we might have to face the fact that getting the ‘culture crowd’ to invest in a new social network (or platform) like NARB might take more investment than we can bring to the party. At the same time, our dedicated social tools for exhibitions have succeeded in attracting some solid use, especially when combined with a competition formula. As long as it’s a easy to understand and has a clear goal with richer incentives these more physical interactions seem to entice people to use them.

What’s our take-away from all this?

For starters, something has to change. While visitors numbers are OK, considering the art niche, it’s not enough to build a sustaining business model as the participation in our platform is generally too low volume. This combined with the cold hard fact that getting the actual data to be able to show which exhibitions or events are taking place where, let alone which are the most worthwhile, is too time consuming since right now it can’t be done without at least some manual labor involved.

What do we want to change?

We already have a few ideas about how to transform the current website into something that will be more viable in the future and be easier to support both from our point of view and from the point of view of the venues listed on our site. From a business perspective we think NARB should concentrate on activities that can return on investment. Right now that’s installation work, consulting and creating tools for cultural institutions that will allow these institutions to get online sooner, better and easier. In some ways we built a site for a future that just isn’t there yet. So were taking a step back and seeing which things need to be in place first before the full NARB vision can actually come to fruition. The most glaring thing in need of improvement is the state of cultural data. While agencies such as the dutch Uitburo do what they can to scrape together data about events from a myriad of sources it’s far from an ideal situation and in most cases the data is not complete, nor correct or in other ways flawed. That’s no fault of the Uitburo, they do what they can with the resources they have, but it’s a result of a system that is basically broken. For each exhibition taking place in NL, there are 100 people hired across the country, typing in dates for events into their own little database, sending out press releases and generally duplicating each others work. While the obvious source for exhibition data, or event data of any kind, should be the venue that’s hosting the event in the first place. Or at least thats what we think.


This is obviously not a problem that’s easily fixed, if it’s possible to fix it at all, but there are already solutions out there and we’ll try and figure out how we can make those tools easier to find, easier to use and when they don’t exist yet we might create tools ourselves that would allow venues to easily publish their event date online for use in NARB and other event guides, magazines et al.


In the meantime we’ll try and adapt our site to work better by focusing more on the venues themselves instead of events taking place. This is data which is widely available right now and for most countries and cities worldwide. At the same time we’ll try and widen our reach a bit to encompass more than just contemporary art by opening up to cultural venues in general. We’re not going to go into clubs, bars and music halls but we might add the history museum or that cool design shop / gallery downtown.


Thing is, these are all just ideas right now. We’re working with museums and other cultural events right now to make some of this happen but as far as the site, and the iPhone app, is concerned all possibilities are still up in the air. In the coming months we’ll be talking to a wide range of people and asking their and your help in figuring out what NARB should look like in the future to become the worthwhile addition to the cultural arena that we hope it will be at some point.


Practically speaking you might notice some small changes to the site now and then. Some of the functionality you have come to take for granted might disappear, for lack of it being used. Some other things might take their place. Do not despair, it’s all part of the plan. So here’s our perspective, we’d love to hear

yours!


Yours sincerely, Tijs & James

Comments (View)
Sep
22nd
Tue
permalink

Boijmans + NARB

(image of comment + rating activity stream projection)

We just completed some work with Museum Boijmans van Beuningen. NARB is powering the Design Prize exhibition which opened September 15, 2009. The Design Prize runs across the Design Prize website and NARB, so two communities can participate. You can rate the pieces either from within the venue at the exhibition itself using a console next to the rating and comment stream wall, from the design prize website or use NARB web app or mobile offerings(iphone + mobile website) to do this.

We’re really excited to be able to start providing tools for curators and exhibition designers as we’re not only an online art guide. It’s the beginning of a set of tools we’ve been developing for museums. It’s now easy to add a small collection or exhibition and let the public rate it and add comments. You can then show these live at the location as part of an installation as well as giving your visitors a way to rate using both web and mobile (iphone and mobile website). It’s possible to host the collection and scoring on your own web page too. Do drop us a line if you are interested in this or have ideas of your own. While we are working on a whole bunch of new stuff, we want to hear what exhibition designers have on their feature wish-list.

Comments (View)
Jul
24th
Fri
permalink
For example, today’s iPhones are capable of taking a picture of art in a museum, but don’t have the capability to provide the user with detailed information about the piece of art, such as the name of the painter or any other related information. Similarly, iPhones can snap pictures of structural items such as bridges and buildings, but not identify them.
Apple findings detail ID app. Seems like Apple is trying to patent tech that NARB, Roomware and many others have already built or described all over the place. I wish them luck but i do hope the US patent office is not as broken as it sometimes seems to be and they actually get awarded the patent.
Comments (View)
May
22nd
Fri
permalink

NARB loves Wiki loves art

Monday june 1st Wiki loves art/NL kicks off at the Jewish Historic Museum in Amsterdam. Wiki loves art aims to add more photographs of art to Wikipedia making them publicly available. The NARB team will be there and so can you! :)

The kick off features photo workshops and a highlights tour of the museum and participation is free. Just send an e-mail to evenementen@jhm.nl and mention Wiki loves art/NL.

For more info on Wiki loves art check out www.wikilovesart.nl/jhm

Comments (View)
May
21st
Thu
permalink
In our continued quest to make the activity on the site more transparent we are now showing some of the stats we collect for each of the different venues, exhibitions and art pieces on the site. These are the stats that together make up the temperature which in turn affects the position in any of our hot lists.
For an exhibition you can now see how many people added it to their agenda and for a venue how many are fans for instance. You can expect more of this type of information in the near future.

In our continued quest to make the activity on the site more transparent we are now showing some of the stats we collect for each of the different venues, exhibitions and art pieces on the site. These are the stats that together make up the temperature which in turn affects the position in any of our hot lists.

For an exhibition you can now see how many people added it to their agenda and for a venue how many are fans for instance. You can expect more of this type of information in the near future.

Comments (View)
May
15th
Fri
permalink

Congrats Gijs van Lith, winner of Art Amsterdam

R/T @Robert Gaal: Art Amsterdam is on and this year’s Thieme Art Award winner has been decided. Go take a look for yourself. http://bit.ly/RyKEN

Comments (View)